For UK property developers

Stop spending £500k to find out your scheme was always going to be refused.

Rasmere reads every officer report in your borough and tells you, in 30 seconds, exactly what the planners have been refusing, and which red flags your scheme will trip, before a single drawing is commissioned.

30 seconds · No login · No card · Real refusal data

£500k
lost per refusal
31%
London refusal rate
26 wks
to find out
Live · UK planning decisions
0 LPAs · 0 decisions
Connecting to planning.data.gov.uk feed…
Last sync · pendingSource: planning.data.gov.uk

Live refusals · streaming from UK LPAs

...excessive depth contrary to LP24......unneighbourly form of development......harm to the character of the conservation area......inadequate amenity space provision......overbearing impact on neighbouring property......material schedule not provided......failure to demonstrate BRE 209 compliance......loss of architectural unity to the terrace......non-compliant with Policy DM-H4......visual dominance from the public realm......excessive depth contrary to LP24......unneighbourly form of development......harm to the character of the conservation area......inadequate amenity space provision......overbearing impact on neighbouring property......material schedule not provided......failure to demonstrate BRE 209 compliance......loss of architectural unity to the terrace......non-compliant with Policy DM-H4......visual dominance from the public realm...

Why now

The market punishes slow learners. Refusal rates are climbing, councils are tightening, and your competition already knows what gets through.

1 in 3
London applications refused

Householder and minor schemes face the highest refusal rates on record. Most are turned down for reasons cited dozens of times before in the same borough.

£500k+
Wasted before you find out

Architect fees, planning consultants, surveys, pre-app meetings. All gone if the scheme was always going to be refused on a pattern your borough has flagged 40 times.

26 weeks
Average time to a refusal

Six months of holding costs, frozen capital, and lost optionality, just to learn what was already in the public record on day one.

For first-time and seasoned developers

If you're putting capital into UK property, you cannot afford to be the last one to read the room.

The good developers already know what their borough refuses. Rasmere gives the rest of the market the same edge, in 30 seconds, before a single fee is committed.

Get my free risk report

A real Rasmere report

This is what you get back. In 30 seconds.

Specific. Cited. Borough-aware. Built from the actual reasons officers have used to refuse comparable schemes.

London Borough of Wandsworth

42 Northcote Road, SW11

Rear extension

Three substantive risks identified for this scheme type at this address. Wandsworth has refused 11 comparable applications in the last 18 months citing nearly identical reasoning. Address the items below at design stage to materially reduce refusal risk.

Excessive depth on terraced rear extension
high

Wandsworth's Housing SPD caps single-storey rear extensions at 3.5m on terraces. Officers have refused 7 applications above this in 2024 to 2025.

Conservation area materials not specified
high

Property sits within the Northcote CA. Refusals consistently cite missing material schedules and incompatible glazing systems.

Daylight to neighbour at #44
medium

Adjoining lower ground floor kitchen window likely fails BRE 209 VSC test by ~14% based on parcel geometry.

Refusal risk score
78
/100
High risk · as drawn
Pattern source

The depth, height and bulk of the proposed extension would be excessive and would result in an unneighbourly form of development contrary to Policy LP24...

Officer report · 2024/3187 · Wandsworth

The asymmetry

The data is public. The interpretation is not.

Every refusal is explained in a public officer's report. Across hundreds of these reports, clear patterns emerge, but no developer reads them at scale, and architects advise from memory rather than systematic analysis. Rasmere is the missing data layer beneath both.

Refusals are predictable

70%+ of refusals in the average London borough cite reasons that have appeared in 5+ prior decisions. The signal is sitting in plain sight.

The cost of being wrong

A refused 6-unit scheme costs £300k to £800k in holding costs, redesign, planning consultants, and lost time. A single refusal can wipe a year's margin.

No tool sits beneath the consultant

Architects design. Planning consultants react. Nothing tells the developer, before drawings start, which patterns the officer is going to apply to their scheme.

The method

Run a site through Rasmere before drawings start.

01
Drop in the address
We resolve it to the exact LPA in milliseconds.
02
Pick the application type
Rear extension, loft, basement, change of use, new build.
03
Get the risk read
Score, red flags, cited refusal patterns, what to fix.
04
Brief your architect
Design out the avoidable risks before paying for drawings.
Live coverage

5 London boroughs. New LPA shipped monthly.

Wandsworth, Lambeth, Camden, Hackney, Croydon. Outside coverage we still produce a general UK risk read, flagged clearly so you know what's borough-specific data and what's pattern-based reasoning.

Try it now
Wandsworth
Lambeth
Camden
Hackney
Croydon
+ rolling out

The shift

Two ways to find out your scheme will be refused.

One costs six figures and twenty-six weeks. The other costs nothing and takes thirty seconds.

The old way
£500k

Commission, draw, submit, wait, refuse.

  1. Wk 0Pay architect retainer (£15-40k)
  2. Wk 6Drawings done, planning consultant briefed
  3. Wk 8Submit application, pay LPA fee
  4. Wk 26Refusal letter cites the same reasons used 11 times before
  5. Wk 27+Redesign, resubmit, or appeal. Holding costs accrue daily.
With Rasmere
£0

Test the scheme before you spend a penny.

  1. 00:00Drop the address into Rasmere
  2. 00:08Pick application type (rear extension, loft, basement...)
  3. 00:30Risk score, red flags, and the exact refusal patterns to design out
  4. Day 1Brief your architect with cited risks, not assumptions
  5. Wk 26An approval, not a refusal letter
Run mine free

Trust & transparency

Built on the public record. Cited, auditable, and never invented.

Every risk in your report links back to a real, published officer decision. We do not guess, we do not hallucinate, and we do not sell your data.

Official source

Sourced from planning.data.gov.uk

We ingest decisions directly from the UK government's planning data service and each LPA's published register. No scraping of paywalled sources, no second hand rumours.

Auditable

Every red flag is cited

Each refusal pattern in your report names the borough, the application type, and the verbatim policy reason. You can verify it against the public officer report.

ICO aligned

UK GDPR compliant

We store the minimum data needed to deliver your report. Your address is never sold, shared, or used to train external models. Encryption in transit and at rest.

No false certainty

We tell you what we don't know

If a borough has thin data or your application type is rare, the report says so plainly. Confidence is shown, not hidden behind a single number.

Honest scope

Risk intelligence, not legal advice

Rasmere is a decision support tool, not a planning consultant. We are upfront about the line, and your report includes a plain English limitations note.

Operator built

Built by people who have lost £500k

The team has commissioned the architect, paid the consultant, and read the refusal letter. Rasmere exists because the old way is broken, not because AI is fashionable.

100%
Officer decisions cited verbatim
0
Personal data sold or shared
Daily
Sync from public LPA registers
UK only
Data residency for your reports
TLS 1.3 in transit AES 256 at rest UK GDPR and DPA 2018 UK data residency

Position

What Rasmere is, and what it isn't.

It is
  • Pre-submission decision intelligence, used before drawings are commissioned
  • Pattern analysis of refusal reasons by borough and application type
  • A data product that gets sharper with every officer report ingested
It is not
  • A guarantee that any application will be approved
  • A replacement for an architect or planning consultant
  • A crystal ball. Planning decisions can never be fully predicted

Don't pay £500k to find out your scheme was always going to fail.

30 seconds. Zero commitment. See the refusal patterns before you commission a single drawing.